🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it feels like it’s time for a reassessment. As time has passed, an event that began as a celebration and reminder of heritage, traditions and links between global Black communities, has taken on a corporate feel, broadening to incorporate functions where African descendants are remunerated to talk to predominantly white listeners about implicit prejudice and active solidarity. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests created a surge in the business of showcasing anti-racist commitment. Yet, that phase is now over. The tide has crested, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what increasing understanding is for.

The Background of Black History Celebration

First commemorated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was created in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with seven days of celebration and reflection in the second week of February. Black History Month developed from this movement and was officially launched in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the North America in February, but also in autumn in the Britain, the Federal Republic of Germany, Ireland and the Netherlands.

The month has transformed since those days, focusing less on the narratives of transatlantic enslavement and civil rights battles, and greater focus on prominent Black figures in government, the arts, and social movements, and extensively acknowledging the impact Black people have made to shape the country. It is in schools where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with talks and cultural events. But the manner the observance is commemorated is a manifestation of the current political situation. How it evolves is a good lesson in how appropriation leads to dismantling: the reshaping of Black History Month has hindered the purpose of it, which is to confront embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Jarring Moment

Few things illustrate how critical it is to reevaluate Black History Month more than the particular moment in which it occurs this year. In the UK, a revitalized conservative movement in the guise of the Reform party is ahead in surveys. In the recent season we saw the biggest extreme right demonstration in British history. a prominent political figure, the person of color at the helm of the Conservative party, is a firm opponent of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a position where a elected representative gains confidence to say that “not seeing any white faces” in certain urban areas is a cause for alarm. Meanwhile, far-right parties are growing in Europe as a entirety.

In the United States, a massive attack against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been carried, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the supreme judicial bodies of the country. A effort to erase African American heritage and experience from the records is in progress. One of the former president's initial presidential directives aimed at the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the renowned cultural organization, accusing them of a coordinated and broad attempt to change the national past” by portraying America “as naturally discriminatory”.

Against this backdrop, the observance illustrates how little it can be impactful if it is limited to either obligatory business commemorations, or politically neutered commemorations of historical achievements, rather than confronting the conditions of the current era. It also reveals how its restricted time span means that it is disconnected from the more extensive continuous action that is needed. Denise Miller, a educator at an educational institution, put it best when she expressed apprehension about the temporary “tokenism” of the month. “The issue with taking a tokenistic approach”, she stated, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month evolves into a fleeting performance rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Determining how to alter, change and broaden initiatives for racial equality and recognition in such times of discouragement and concern is a difficult task. There is a inclination to just discontinue observances such as Black History Month altogether, believing they are inadequate for current needs, or are relics of an time that has not worked.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and tradition of activism for racial justice – local anti-racism groups, inclusion and equity efforts, and certainly, even commercial engagements – constitute an infrastructure that a lot of work has been invested in. It is there not merely to decline as the politics moves on (and in fact, declines), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month seem? Well, first, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is spread out through the year (as certain organizations are already beginning to do), parts of its content (particularly around prominent figures of color) integrated into academic syllabi. It would also be a time that does not evade politics, and leaves space for individuals, particularly young people, to air their fears and experiences. What purpose serves simple recognition of the past when it doesn’t reckon with the contemporary truth of far-right rallies in the urban areas? Establishments who celebrate it should not be pacified with the non-confrontational words of hidden discrimination and sensitivity to minor insults, but confronted with the threats that impact society if opposition to discrimination is not approached earnestly. To summarize, Black History Month should be made current, pressing, and reactive. It could be that an complete renaming is necessary – Contemporary Black History Month.